(𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐭𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐒𝐧𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚 𝐛𝐲 𝐑𝐚𝐣𝐢𝐯 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐫𝐚 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐕𝐢𝐣𝐚𝐲𝐚 𝐕𝐢𝐬𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧)
It [Harvard] is the leading global nexus where Critical Race Theory [CRT] is being applied to India. We showed two kinds of outputs from this massive effort: The development of CRT-based theories that are specific to India and can serve as atrocity literature to prosecute India, especially Hinduism. The training of a large number of Indian scholars, industrialists, tech entrepreneurs, NGO leaders, and various other activists in the use of this material in India. Concurrently, what we also exposed was China’s deep connections with Harvard and the complex web of its public and private sector alliances with the university and various American think tanks. These relationships, along with the flow of funds to Harvard indicate that the elite institution has been compromised by the Chinese. This has serious implications for India, especially because it’s an unequal exchange, with raw data flowing from India to Harvard, and social theories, ideologies, and trained intellectuals flowing back from Harvard to India. Basking in the glory of American academic institutions, several prominent Indian billionaires have established centers named after themselves at Harvard. This has helped Harvard and its American and Chinese collaborators build bridges of access to India in various sectors, including government policy, public health, digital infrastructure, higher education, media, and culture. In other words, foreign academic institutions, of which Harvard is primary, are gaining access to Indian data, Indian government organizations, the best Indian minds, and even fund raising from the Indian public.
Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
*
Indian and Western business leaders are participating in the adoption of the latest Harvard-spun corporate social credit rubric based on Western narratives (i.e., the ESG system of rating companies). Besides, some of them are also facilitating extensive data collection in India. They have access to numerous Indian fronts to access big data on population, public health and other sensitive information. They are running large- scale pilot projects as proof-of-concept for digital transformation, which allows them to experiment with strategies of social engineering. These public- and private-NGO alliances do appear to be uplifting the common person in India in the short term. But their sprawling apparatus also allows them to steal peoples’ agency and manipulate their consent. In the process, India’s wealth is in danger of being sucked out, with the potential for unprecedented concentration of wealth and power ending up in the hands of a few that have their own personal interests. The Breaking India activity is a powerful machinery that has penetrated Indian society at its very core. Many of India’s universities (both public and private), media houses, corporate houses, tech start- ups, and various other institutions have been compromised. One is left wondering if the Government of India too is looking to Harvard as the vishwa guru to solve all its problems. For instance, the Indian government trains its bureaucrats at Harvard and other elitist foreign institutions. There is inadequate concern about the way many top Indian minds are connected to the Western elite. Breaking India 1.0 may have been contained in scope, demographics, players, and resources. Breaking India 2.0, however, is a broader sell-out of our future generations, our customs, our history, our heritage, and our way of life. The table that follows summarizes the key differences between Breaking India 1.0 and Breaking India 2.0.
*
We will first discuss the Andhra Pradesh-based Krea University and its links with MIT’s J-PAL (a Saudi funded project) and Yale, before diving into a more detailed analysis of Ashoka University. This will clearly show the direction that Indian academia has taken. Krea and Ashoka proudly project themselves as ‘the Harvard of India’, bringing American liberal arts to the country. But in the process, like Harvard, they are inadvertently dismantling many traditions of India. The boards of both Ashoka and Krea sport a constellation of world class luminaries from India and overseas with deep connections to Ivy League universities. They are setting up infrastructure within and outside India, and the seamless pipelines they are building can be used to transport ideas for brainwashing young Indian students and siphon off big data. Our purpose is to present facts and not adjudicate. It is for the reader to draw inferences and probe deeper. The government hires some foreign professors as advisers and facilitates their collaborations in Indian industry, thinktanks and research organizations. The media is also being funded by a coalition that reduces the direct exposure of the participants.
As an example, Omidyar Foundation, run by a Silicon Valley billionaire, has become a big player in India with private and public alliances. Likewise, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and other NGOs like Amnesty International that already enjoy support from Harvard are also partnering with the Indian government. They work with Ashoka and other universities to ensure that government policies are favorable to their ideologies. Indians are getting trained in various theories that support Western hegemony, while the West is gaining access to Indian big data and creating archives on India.
*
(to be continued)
Pierre Morad Omidyar (born Parviz Morad Omidyar, June 21, 1967) is a French-born Iranian-American billionaire
